|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[e-drug] IMF and the World Bank
- Subject: [e-drug] IMF and the World Bank
- From: "Dimitri Peffer" <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:14:57 -0500 (EST)
E-drug: IMF and the World Bank
---------------------------------------------
See one interesting article on
http://www.id21.org/zinter/id21zinter.exe?a=2&i=s7amej1g1&u=3dd215f6
Dimitri
__________________________________
Dimitri Peffer
M.Sc. Health Economics
Assessor de Auditoria
Central de Medicamentos e Artigos M�dicos
Minist�rio da Sa�de
Mocambique
"Dimitri Peffer" <[email protected]>
The IMF and World Bank: undermining democracy and rolling back the state?
Abstract : "The IMF and World Bank: undermining democracy and rolling
back the state? Why are anti-IMF protests sweeping the developing
world? Is it privileged students and anarchists who are behind the
wave of unrest? Who are taking to the streets and how are their
livelihoods being affected by liberalisation? Are Poverty Reduction
Strategy Papers (PRSPs) merely Structural Adjustment Programmes
(SAPs) in another guise? Mark Ellis-Jones - World Development
Movement, UK - 19 September 2002"
Why are anti-IMF protests sweeping the developing world?
A hard-hitting report from the World Development Movement charts
recent civil unrest in 23 developing countries directed against
policies championed by the IMF. Citing evidence drawn from official
documents that the free market policy model is failing, it points out
that protesters in countries of the South come from across the social
spectrum. Peasants, the unemployed and indigenous people are joining
trade unionists, public sector workers, religious leaders, doctors,
teachers, small businessmen and, in some cases, even policemen in
venting their anger.
Of the 23 countries documented, three quarters have IMF-sponsored
privatisation programmes. In 2001 seventy six people, including a
fourteen-year-old boy, were killed, and thousands injured and
arrested in protests. In half the countries, civil servants and vital
public sector workers protested at policies that have cut their
income or led to redundancies. In a third of the countries, people
demonstrated against the rising prices of basic goods and services as
public subsidies and price controls have been removed.
The report argues that the IMF and World Bank are not heeding the
concerns of those suffering from reduced state expenditure, currency
devaluation, divestiture of state assets and raised interest rates.
PRSPs include the same policy prescriptions as SAPs, albeit couched
in the language of development. Developing country governments have
little leeway to counter the effects of liberalisation as they remain
locked into a dependent relationship with the international financial
institutions and donor governments.
Highlights from the 23 country reports include:
- of the 77 episodes of civil unrest cited, 18 ended with the
deployment of riot police or the army - often against initially
peaceful protests
- endorsing the bypassing of democratic process, the IMF
congratulated Argentina's government on obtaining emergency powers
to legislate by decree on tax policy and public sector reform
- pressured by the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank, Nepal
suddenly hiked electricity prices by 40 percent
- the selling of Johannesburg's water system to Suez Lyonnaise des
Eaux (without any plan to extend supply to poor neighbourhoods) and
other privatisations have infuriated South African trade unionists
who believed in the ANC's pledge to provide free basic services to
the poorest of the poor
- in several countries, teachers and health workers took to the
streets at the failure of governments to pay salary arrears or keep
wages in line with inflation.
Implications arising from the report suggest that unless the
international financial institutions pay more heed to the negative
consequences of liberalisation: in developing countries, NGOs, trade
unions and the general public will increasingly blame the IMF and
World Bank as the source of poverty
- governments will continue to lose legitimacy in the eyes of their citizens
- with all other avenues blocked, and developing country governments
powerless to act in the interests of their citizens, direct action is
sure to increase in intensity.
Contributor(s): Mark Ellis-Jones
Source(s): 'States of Unrest II: Resistance to IMF and World Bank
policies in poor countries' by Mark Ellis-Jones, World Development
Movement, April 2002 Also see: 'States of Unrest I' by Mark
Ellis-Jones, World Development Movement, September 2000
--
To send a message to E-Drug, write to: [email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: [email protected]
in the body of the message type: subscribe e-drug OR unsubscribe e-drug
To contact a person, send a message to: [email protected]
Information and archives: http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug
|