|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
E-DRUG: Malaria prophylaxis
- Subject: E-DRUG: Malaria prophylaxis
- From: "Steve Toovey" <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 02:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
E-drug: Malaria prophylaxis (cont.)
-----------------------------------
Thanks to e-druggers who responded to my question on the efficacy of
chloroquine and paludrine. Replies appear to indicate a belief that
mefloquine and doxycycline are more efficacious than chloroquine and
paludrine. There are studies comparing mefloquine with doxycycline,
and mefloquine with the combination, but does anybody have
any evidence, even anecdotal, comparing doxycycline with the
combination?
The following report is cut from the UK Malaria Reference Centre
report on the Eurosurveillance website
http://www.eurosurv.org/main.htm
Rise in falciparum malaria imported from east
Africa
A marked rise in the number of cases of
falciparum malaria contracted in east Africa,
imported to the United Kingdom (UK) and reported
to the Malaria Reference Laboratory, was seen in
the first quarter of 1998. One hundred and
fifty-four cases were notified, as compared with
a mean of 29 cases for the same period in the
preceding four years. Two contributory factors
are a great increase in malaria transmission due
to unusually heavy rains in Kenya and Uganda,
which has led to large increases in the incidence
of malaria in the indigenous populations, and an
increase in the use of chloroquine/proguanil
prophylaxis, rather than mefloquine, by short
term visitors. Guidelines for travellers from the
United Kingdom revised in September 1997 (1)
accepted this alternative in view of concern
about and unwillingness to take mefloquine but
warned of the reduced protection. No data exist
on the proportions of visitors taking the
different regimens each year, so the relative
importance of the two contributory factors cannot
be stated. Sixty-eight cases reported in the
first quarter of 1998 took no antimalarial
chemoprophylaxis, compared with a mean of 16.25
in the preceding four years; three took
mefloquine compared with 0.5; and 39 took
proguanil plus chloroquine, compared with 2.75.
The increase in cases was sevenfold among those
exposed in Kenya: compared with fourfold among
those exposed elsewhere in east Africa. There is
also anecdotal evidence of an increase in
clinical cases of severe malaria in the UK over
this period.
These data emphasise the incomplete protection
afforded by chloroquine/proguanil, the need for
early diagnosis and prompt treatment of any
febrile illness, and for action by travellers to
reduce the chance of being bitten by mosquitoes
between dusk and dawn (1).
References:
1.Bradley DJ, Warhurst DC, on behalf of an
expert
group of doctors, nurses, and pharmacists.
Guidelines for the prevention of malaria in
travellers from the United Kingdom. Commun
Dis Rep CDR Rev 1997; 7: R137-52. (
http://www.phls.co.uk/cdsc/ )
Reported by David Bradley ([email protected]),
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
London, England.
Thanks
Dr Stephen Toovey
Johannesburg
Steve Toovey
Mailto:[email protected]
--
Send mail for the `E-Drug' conference to `[email protected]'.
Mail administrative requests to `[email protected]'.
For additional assistance, send mail to: `[email protected]'.
|