|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
E-DRUG: Many NSAID users who bleed don't know when to stop
- Subject: E-DRUG: Many NSAID users who bleed don't know when to stop
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 09:19:40 -0500 (EST)
E-DRUG: Many NSAID users who bleed don't know when to stop
----------------------------------------------------------
British Medical Journal (www.bmj.com) Vol 316 Editorial Feb 14 1998
Many NSAID users who bleed don't know when to stop
Uncomprehending "adherence" is dangerous
Andrew Herxheimer
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation are common and serious
adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. About a third
of all ulcer bleeding in older people is associated with these drugs(1,2);
the same may apply to perforation. The most important predisposing
influences are the type and dose of drug (and use of two non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory agents together), which can increase the risk up to
20-fold. Other risk factors include prior ulcer,(3) anticoagulants,
systemic corticosteroids,(4) smoking,(5) alcohol consumption,(6) and old
age.(1)(3) Some of these are independent, so that treatment with
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases an already high risk. As
we look for ways of lowering the risk of bleeding in patients using
non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, an ingenious investigation from
Newcastle offers a new lead.(6)
Wynne and Long studied 50 consecutive patients admitted to hospital with
an acute gastrointestinal bleed who had taken any of four commonly used
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the preceding three days and 100
controls from local practices - matched for age, sex, drug, and dosage -
who had not bled.(6) All patients were visited at home by a nurse to
assess their knowledge of their arthritis treatment. The nurse asked
whether the patients had received any information about possible side
effects of the drug, if so from where, and what they had been advised to
do if side effects occurred. She asked the index patients, "Did you have
any stomach problems, such as indigestion or pain before your stomach
bleed?" and the controls, "Have you had any stomach problems, such as
indigestion or pain?" The nurse also asked the patients to estimate how
much of the prescribed dose they actually took and, if it was less than
prescribed, why so.
It turned out not only that the patients who had bled into the gut knew
less about the side effects of their drugs or what to do when they
occurred than did the controls but also that they stuck more closely to
the prescribed dosage. Fewer index patients (16%) than controls (41%)
remembered having been told of the potential side effects or about what
to do if they developed an adverse effect (4% versus 21%). "Full
compliance" was commoner among the index patients (96%) than among the
controls (70%). Furthermore, 18 (36%) of the index patients had had
epigastric pain before the bleed and all but two had continued to take the
drug, whereas only 15 (15%) of the controls had had dyspepsia, of whom 10
had reduced their intake.
Perhaps this study should be interpreted cautiously: it was fairly small;
patients with a complication may be more likely to claim that they were
inadequately warned; and dyspepsia is widely accepted to be a poor guide
to ulceration - though this has not been critically examined in relation
to use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Nevertheless, it looks
as if ignorance about side effects led to failure to recognise warning
symptoms and to inappropriate compliance. Ten of the 16 patients who had
pain but continued their drug and bled might not have bled if they had
stopped the drug at once. Ten bleeds fewer out of 50 would be a useful
reduction.
As the authors say, we need effective methods of increasing patients'
knowledge and understanding of side effects - and this applies not only
to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In particular we must try to
ensure that patients and doctors share the same goals in medicine taking
and move from compliance to concordance.(7,8) Establishing what works best
will take time and effort. But for a start, whenever doctors, pharmacists,
and nurses see a patient who is using a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ]
drug they could check whether the patient understands two things. Firstly,
they should understand that the drug is for symptomatic relief and should
be used only when arthritic pain or inflammation is troublesome. Some
patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis may have to take the drug all
the time, but most others do not. Prescribers and patients should not aim
at complete relief by using high doses because this increases the risk of
damaging the gut; they should accept partial relief. Secondly, they should
know that stomach pain or indigestion is a signal to stop taking the drug
if possible; if this is not possible, they and the doctor should consider
whether to reduce the dose.
Of 21 patient information leaflets for oral non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, nine tell the patient to stop taking the drug if
such symptoms occur; the others say "tell your doctor" or something
similar.* The points about symptomatic relief and using moderate doses
whenever possible are almost completely absent. The Medicines Control
Agency should insist that the leaflets are clear and consistent on these
points.
*I did the survey in spring 1997 and I thank Andrew King and David Scott
for obtaining leaflets not in the ABPI Compendium of Patient Information
Leaflets 1996-97.
Andrew Herxheimer Adviser
Health Action International-Europe,
9 Park Crescent, London N3 2NL
email: [email protected]
References
1 Somerville K, Faulkner G, Langman M. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs and bleeding peptic ulcer. Lancet 1986;i:462-4.
2 Faulkner G, Prichard P, Somerville K, Langman M J S. Aspirin and
bleeding ulcers in the elderly. BMJ 1988;297:1311-3.
3 Laporte J-R, Carn� X, Vidal X, Moreno V, Juan J. Upper gastrointestinal
bleeding in relation to previous use of analgesics and non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet 1991;337:85-9.
4 Piper O M, Ray W A, Daugherty J R, Griffin M R. Corticosteroid use and
peptic ulcer disease: role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann
Intern Med 1991;114:735-40.
5 Henry D, Dobson A, Turner C. Variability in the risk of major
gastrointestinal complications from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Gastroenterology 1993;105:1078-88.
6 Wynne H A, Long A. Patient awareness of the adverse effects of
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Br J Clin Pharmacol
1996;42:253-6.
7 Mullen P D. Compliance becomes concordance. BMJ 1997;314:691-2.
8 Marinker M. From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in
medicine taking. BMJ 1997;314:747-8.
--
Send mail for the `E-Drug' conference to `[email protected]'.
Mail administrative requests to `[email protected]'.
For additional assistance, send mail to: `[email protected]'.
|