|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[e-drug] Medicines advertising on TV (cont)
- Subject: [e-drug] Medicines advertising on TV (cont)
- From: "Ans Timmermans" <[email protected]>
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 23:29:48 -0400 (EDT)
E-drug: Medicines advertising on TV (cont)
---------------------------------------------
Dear Martin and other e-Druggers,
Your perception of this alienation from newly developed drugs does
not sound unfamiliar.
Although I have originally been trained as a hospital pharmacist,
just like you, working in humanitarian aid in the past years did also
place me in a similar situation. I cannot say that I am on top of all
the latest developed drugs of the so called 'lifestyle' diseases as
you put it, but I am more trying to follow what is in the pipeline
for the more neglected diseases like TB, malaria, childhood
illnesses, etc.
This is for a number of reasons, of which the most important is time
constraints of course. Another reason is limited access to unbiased
information especially in remote areas, but also by working in the
public health field, most of these newly developed drugs are not
relevant to our beneficiaries (at least not for today). They are
developed for �life-style' diseases, sometimes their extra value is
too limited to justify their increased price, and they are only
targeting a minority of people who can afford them. As a pharmacist,
I want to know about all drugs that arrive on the market, but as a
public health worker, I must make a choice of where to invest most of
my time in.
I do not want to go into the discussion of who the good and the bad
guys are, since I believe that giving people access to drugs is about
working on a package of solutions that should be a done from a
partnership, where the pharmaceutical industry is involved in as
well. They are as much part of the solution, as of the problem.
However I just want to repeat a few well-known facts from MSF and WHO
that provide a reason for the focus of my attention.
Of the 1223 new drugs that were introduced between 1975 and 1997,
only 13 have been specifically developed to treat tropical diseases
(Background of Access to Medicines Campaign, MSF website), while next
to HIV/AIDS, TB, malaria and diarrhea are the major killers in the
developing world. These diseases are causing death tolls that make
these diseases next to a health problem/disaster, also an economic
and social disaster. Although access to drugs is reported to be
improving, still one third of the world's population lacks access to
essential drugs. People in developing countries spend most of their
household budget on drugs, very often bought in the private sector
with little assurance about drug quality, which is keeping poor
people in a downward spiral of impoverishment. Many developing
countries do not have a national drug policy or a functional drug
regulatory authority to protect their consumers. Less than one third
of developing countries benefit from effective drug regulation, and
this against a globalization of the drug trade.
According to a number of surveys in developing countries, 10 to 20%
of sampled drugs fail quality control tests (WHO Medicines Strategy
2000-2003). I think as NGO workers, we should keep on addressing
these issues to the international community while trying to build the
capacity of the pharmaceutical system of the countries we are working
in, and this in an atmosphere of collaboration with all partners and
recognizing each other's strengths and limitations.
To get back to your question whether these drugs are essential or
not, in short I would say that technically, according to the WHO
definition of essential drugs, they are not essential for the world's
population since they are not satisfying the health care needs of the
majority of the population and they are not available at all times or
in the appropriate dosage forms. However, if you look at essential in
a particular setting with a particular disease pattern, level of care
and training of health care workers and financial resources
available, these drugs may become essential for certain groups of
individuals, so I guess it depends on the level of care you wish or
you can afford to provide to individuals without taking away
resources to treat larger groups of the population you are serving.
Nevertheless, I always appreciate any suggestions from other
e-Druggers for how to be updated of new drugs on the market in the
most time-efficient way,
Best wishes,
Ans Timmermans
Pharmacist
International Rescue Committee
www.theIRC.org
"Ans Timmermans" <[email protected]>
--
To send a message to E-Drug, write to: [email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: [email protected]
in the body of the message type: subscribe e-drug OR unsubscribe e-drug
To contact a person, send a message to: [email protected]
Information and archives: http://www.healthnet.org/programs/edrug.html
|